A Brief Criticism of the ‘Two Paths to Liberation’ Theory
Abstract
The present paper briefly points out problems with the assumption that the early Buddhist discourses are best read as reflecting a tension between two contrasting accounts of how liberating insight is gained, one of which involves a purely intellectual understanding of the four noble truths and the other relies on absorption attainment as productive of insight in and of itself.
Full Text:
PDFRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Ven. Anālayo